Juicero: The $400 Solution to a Problem Nobody Had

I like juice as much as the next person but...

Imagine a juicer that could change the world! Yeah, neither can I. But that didn’t stop Juicero or its founder who likened himself to Steve Jobs (Recode’s Kara Swisher). I don’t remember where I first heard about this spectacular fail, but it is definitely a good story with a very valuable lesson

Juicero, founded in 2013, offered a sleek $700 cold juice press (later repriced at $400) that pressed fruit and vegetable packets into “juice.” That’s basically it. It had a lot of hightech moving parts and components - DRM and internet connectivity. And it looked great - sort of like if Apple made a juicer. 


Google Ventures backed it as did notable VCs to the tune of $116M. There was definitely a market for pure vegan drinks, but the flaw was in the product conception. Did anyone ever ask if this product solved a problem? Nope. 


It soon became evident that people could simply squeeze the juice packets into their glass, and do it faster than the Juicero. But this was
after the product had already been released. It’s easy to make fun of something that is so obvious, but I can see how it might have happened. It’s sort of like how people just went along with the notion that WeWork was a tech company, not a property leasing company.


I don’t know if Juicero ever did any user testing of their product. I can’t imagine it was terribly effective if they did. Maybe they asked all the wrong questions? Maybe the fatal flaw was in seeing themselves as a tech company, when tech was just a part of their product but not the driving innovation that could sustain a company. I’m not saying you
can’t make a better juicer. But I’m also not saying there’s definitely a business case to try to either. 


I could imagine working at a place like Juicero, where people are so excited and blinded by their enthusiasm that they miss the forest for the trees. It’s definitely a cautionary tale not to lose sight of the bigger picture.

By Erica Wollmering February 7, 2022
I sent this gif to my sister with the text, “I’m testing the Photoshop line.” She promptly responded, “Ya crossed it.” I agree 1000%. When has the Photoshop line been crossed? Ya know it when you see it. Here’s the thing, people know what I actually look like IRL so using a majorly Photoshopped image of myself is pretty inauthentic. But where is the line? Everyone wants to look their best. Most women wear at least some makeup every day. Other people get Botox, lasers, and fillers as part of their beauty regimen. Does that make a person inauthentic? For this series of pictures, I took a plain photo of myself - unslept, unshowered, sans makeup and morphed it into something more aesthetically pleasing. Does it still look like me? Nope, but I’m curious. If you were to divorce the face from the person you know, how would this change someone’s impression of you? Not knowing me personally, if you were to judge the first image of me, what would you think? How about the last image?
By Erica Wollmering August 7, 2021
At some point you’ve likely used or thought of using stock photography to tell your brand story. What could possibly be the drawback?
By Erica Wollmering August 7, 2021
Information architecture is really a recursive process of human behavior that plays out in real life.
By Erica Wollmering August 3, 2021
When endless daydreaming is made even easier.
By Erica Wollmering August 3, 2021
How do you know if your headshot is saying the right thing to the right person? You might just need more than one.
Share by: